Posting rules: All registered members can create threads and post to existing ones.
Question Canon content published fonts
- Amelia_R
-
Topic Author
Just for the record, my old eyes really, really hate reading anything lengthy in a sans-serif font.

- Phoenix Spiritus
-
Someone with Editing access and HTML kudos needs to go in and clean it out.
Yes, I did examine the web page HTML code as soon as I saw the story, it looked weird, I'm sure I wasn't the only one in this group that did.
- Kristin Darken
-
Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- Dawnfyre
-
( turning smart quotes off in ms orifice means you never have those screwey &A(gibberish) showing in published content, but people like having poorly displayed content and refuse to tun the imbecilic smart quotes off. )
Stupidity is a capitol offense, a summary not indictable one.
- Sir Lee
-
One, of course, is to make sure that the server HTTP headers and the HTML header META tags are set up to the actual encoding the page is using. That way, browsers have no problem correctly decoding it.
Another way, if you don't have much control over the server, is to encode all non-7-bit-ASCII characters as HTML character entities. Browsers will interpret “ as an opening double smartquote no matter what.
- mittfh
-
As the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handers are in their right mind!
- Dawnfyre
-
since every separate document could have a different character encoding. :/ ( coming from MSO, wouldn't surprise me.)
Stupidity is a capitol offense, a summary not indictable one.
- Phoenix Spiritus
-
Copy paste in and stripping out the HTML junk code is usually easier, it's just not something all the authors can do, so unfortunately the very busy Kristin needs to do it for those who are not so HTML savvy.
Please be patient, once her senses stop reeling from the Christmas rush of her job, I'm sure she'll get around to it.
- Kristin Darken
-
And while writing it with the web encoding in the first place seems obvious... the authors are NOT web designers. They are writing, using standard word processing software, in traditional methods of creating pages of fiction. Some of these I get from them by email, some by google docs, dropbox, or whatever... some are entered by the author into the site. The author group ranges from web designer savvy to barely happy with using word processors instead of these newfangled typewriters. So there is no ONE right answer.
Let's assume, for the sake of basic arguments, that I have not been completely clueless while converting stories from various authors over the past year and a half and that these things are not a plea for someone to tell me how to do basic web encoding or document conversion... and are, instead, a busy schedule in which the priority is getting you a readable story despite it being far easier for me to simply say "sorry, with the busy holiday there won't be any updates."
You're getting updates. They aren't up to the usual standard. I'm sorry. But not sorry enough to be treated like I'm clueless and need to be walked through the basics every time you find errors.
Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- Sir Lee
-
I like Tidy. I'm a big fan of Tidy. I use Tidy all the time when editing HTML stuff. But I don't really TRUST Tidy to fix stuff automatically. Because it uses pretty naive algorithms to "fix" stuff, and lots of times the "fix" is worse than the initial state.
But Tidy is a great quick-and-dirty, very fast DETECTOR of syntax problems. Not as rigorous as a full HTML validator, but then, it's good enough for more than 90% of stuff. What I do is to run Tidy, take note of the error messages, reload the original file and fix the errors it found by hand. Rinse and repeat. (The process is made easier because the text editor I use, NoteTab, has special support for running Tidy on the file you are editing).
Also, I should note that there are basically three flavors of Tidy going around:
1. The original Tidy by Dave Raggett. It is very old, but you still see it around.
2. The legacy W3C-maintained version, at Sourceforge. It's fine... if you don't want compatibility with HTML5. Otherwise, it will throw lots of errors on new HTML5 elements.
3. The new HTML5 Tidy, with official page at www.html-tidy.org . This is modern and frequently updated. The only problem is that the download page for binaries is not really evident. It is here: binaries.html-tidy.org/
- Warren
-
Remember most of us like to think of ourselves as authors first and webmasters/forum moderators second, PHP programming is WAAAAAAAAAAY Down the list.
There are modules and or instructions out there that will tell us just how to do it, BUT we have to find them on our own time, which cuts into real life and the life of an author.
This site was a big jump for us and we've already stopped at least three hack attempts that I know of. Part of the process is going to have to involve us looking at things to improve CMS without installing a screen door on the submarine. If you get what I'm saying.

Don't push the on-button if you don't know where the off-button is. -- Solomon Short
- Valentine
-
Kristin Darken wrote: The 'simplest' is NOT to save as plain text. This scraps any italics, bold, or underlines that an author may choose to use for emphasis.. or any special formatting intentionally added.
And while writing it with the web encoding in the first place seems obvious... the authors are NOT web designers. They are writing, using standard word processing software, in traditional methods of creating pages of fiction. Some of these I get from them by email, some by google docs, dropbox, or whatever... some are entered by the author into the site. The author group ranges from web designer savvy to barely happy with using word processors instead of these newfangled typewriters. So there is no ONE right answer.
Let's assume, for the sake of basic arguments, that I have not been completely clueless while converting stories from various authors over the past year and a half and that these things are not a plea for someone to tell me how to do basic web encoding or document conversion... and are, instead, a busy schedule in which the priority is getting you a readable story despite it being far easier for me to simply say "sorry, with the busy holiday there won't be any updates."
You're getting updates. They aren't up to the usual standard. I'm sorry. But not sorry enough to be treated like I'm clueless and need to be walked through the basics every time you find errors.
Where's my quill pen and bottle of ink?
And someone go kill a sheep. I need more parchment.
Don't Drick and Drive.
- Arcanist Lupus
-
Valentine wrote:
Kristin Darken wrote: The 'simplest' is NOT to save as plain text. This scraps any italics, bold, or underlines that an author may choose to use for emphasis.. or any special formatting intentionally added.
And while writing it with the web encoding in the first place seems obvious... the authors are NOT web designers. They are writing, using standard word processing software, in traditional methods of creating pages of fiction. Some of these I get from them by email, some by google docs, dropbox, or whatever... some are entered by the author into the site. The author group ranges from web designer savvy to barely happy with using word processors instead of these newfangled typewriters. So there is no ONE right answer.
Let's assume, for the sake of basic arguments, that I have not been completely clueless while converting stories from various authors over the past year and a half and that these things are not a plea for someone to tell me how to do basic web encoding or document conversion... and are, instead, a busy schedule in which the priority is getting you a readable story despite it being far easier for me to simply say "sorry, with the busy holiday there won't be any updates."
You're getting updates. They aren't up to the usual standard. I'm sorry. But not sorry enough to be treated like I'm clueless and need to be walked through the basics every time you find errors.
Where's my quill pen and bottle of ink?
And someone go kill a sheep. I need more parchment.
Hah! You think that you get a quill pen and an ink bottle? Here's a goose and a squid. Have fun.

Be glad I was feeling generous, or you'd have gotten a dinosaur instead and would have to breed your own goose.
"Shared pain is lessened; shared joy, increased — thus do we refute entropy." - Spider Robinson
- Valentine
-
Arcanist Lupus wrote:
Valentine wrote:
Where's my quill pen and bottle of ink?
And someone go kill a sheep. I need more parchment.
Hah! You think that you get a quill pen and an ink bottle? Here's a goose and a squid. Have fun.
Be glad I was feeling generous, or you'd have gotten a dinosaur instead and would have to breed your own goose.
I'm ahead of Elrod, I think he's still using a chisel and stone tablets.

Don't Drick and Drive.