×
Feel free to discuss any typical forums accepted topic here, Whateley or otherwise. Let's avoid the usual suspects: politics, religion, and so forth that tend to result in flame wars and angered forums readers. Other topics will be considered fair game unless they prove to be too volatile, at which point we'll use Devisor created anti-flame chemicals on the subject.
Question The Deed of Paksenarrion
6 years 5 months ago - 6 years 5 months ago #1
by Ahimsa
Posts:
73
Gender:
Unknown
Birthdate:
Unknown
sri-bhagavan uvaca | kalo 'smi loka-ksaya-krt pravrddho | lokan samahartum iha pravrttah | - "Lord Krishna said: I am terrible Time, the destroyer of all beings in all worlds, engaged to destroy all beings in this world." - Bhagavad Gita 11:32
- Ahimsa
-
Topic Author
Has anyone else read this series? I was lucky to find a combined edition in a second-hand bookshop, and it sucked me in for two days.
To cut a long story short, I'm not a fan of Game of Thrones (I could only bear reading up to page 50 of book 1), but one of the things that that series had done that made it popular was subvert expectations. This series was published 8 years before that, and does that as well, and in better ways, in my opinion. It's heroic fantasy, with a large focus on military issues, but somewhat slow moving in many respects, and religious issues are actively intertwined with the narrative in a great way. Most other fantasy I have read either tries too much or too little familiarity with "the gods", and this has a very nice balance.
I've finished the original trilogy, and I'm busy reading "The Legacy of Gird" (a prequel/sequel), and it's just as unputdownable. The world-building this lady did is amaazing, but it was only possible for me to realise that as I was getting into this book.
To cut a long story short, I'm not a fan of Game of Thrones (I could only bear reading up to page 50 of book 1), but one of the things that that series had done that made it popular was subvert expectations. This series was published 8 years before that, and does that as well, and in better ways, in my opinion. It's heroic fantasy, with a large focus on military issues, but somewhat slow moving in many respects, and religious issues are actively intertwined with the narrative in a great way. Most other fantasy I have read either tries too much or too little familiarity with "the gods", and this has a very nice balance.
I've finished the original trilogy, and I'm busy reading "The Legacy of Gird" (a prequel/sequel), and it's just as unputdownable. The world-building this lady did is amaazing, but it was only possible for me to realise that as I was getting into this book.
sri-bhagavan uvaca | kalo 'smi loka-ksaya-krt pravrddho | lokan samahartum iha pravrttah | - "Lord Krishna said: I am terrible Time, the destroyer of all beings in all worlds, engaged to destroy all beings in this world." - Bhagavad Gita 11:32
Last Edit: 6 years 5 months ago by Ahimsa.
6 years 5 months ago #2
by Valentine
Posts:
3121
Gender:
Unknown
Birthdate:
17 Aug 1966
Don't Drick and Drive.
- Valentine
-
One of my favorite books of all time. The final book of the series is a bit of let down, as she tried to close out every storyline.
She is also a prolific SciFi author.
She is also a prolific SciFi author.
Don't Drick and Drive.
6 years 5 months ago #3
by Ahimsa
Posts:
73
Gender:
Unknown
Birthdate:
Unknown
sri-bhagavan uvaca | kalo 'smi loka-ksaya-krt pravrddho | lokan samahartum iha pravrttah | - "Lord Krishna said: I am terrible Time, the destroyer of all beings in all worlds, engaged to destroy all beings in this world." - Bhagavad Gita 11:32
- Ahimsa
-
Topic Author
I didn't know about the sci-fi part, thank you
Once I am done with her fantasy work I will start there.
I do agree that she tried to do a bit too much in the last book.

I do agree that she tried to do a bit too much in the last book.
sri-bhagavan uvaca | kalo 'smi loka-ksaya-krt pravrddho | lokan samahartum iha pravrttah | - "Lord Krishna said: I am terrible Time, the destroyer of all beings in all worlds, engaged to destroy all beings in this world." - Bhagavad Gita 11:32
6 years 5 months ago #4
by Erianaiel
Posts:
133
Gender:
Unknown
Birthdate:
Unknown
- Erianaiel
-
This is, in my opinion, one of the best fantasy trilogies ever written.
From the first book about a young woman who wants more out of life than marrying a sheepherder and is thrown into a bigger conflict than would be expected of a company of mercenary legionaires (short sword and shield) to tackle.
To the final book in the trilogy that does not shy away from confronting protagonist and readers with some very difficult emotional and ethical dilemmas.
The characters are well written, likeable and flawed (but not obviously so, they just have the normal human failings). The world building starts out mundane enouch but over the course of the trilogy mixes in more and more of the fantastical and mythological to keep the universe fresh and surprising throughout. And the story arc of the protagonist is one of the, if not the, best ever written.
I wish somebody could convince Peter Jackson to direct another trilogy, because he could do such amazing things with this story.
A word of warning though. The prequel series (the Gird duology (?) is a classical tragedy, and the sequels are considerably less engaging. Not exactly bad (I do not think Ms Moon can write a bad book) but certainly not up to the extremely high standard of the original Paks trilogy.
Oh, and another word of warning. Do try to read all three books after another. You definitely do not want to have to wait a couple of years between book 2 and 3, trust me on that.
From the first book about a young woman who wants more out of life than marrying a sheepherder and is thrown into a bigger conflict than would be expected of a company of mercenary legionaires (short sword and shield) to tackle.
To the final book in the trilogy that does not shy away from confronting protagonist and readers with some very difficult emotional and ethical dilemmas.
The characters are well written, likeable and flawed (but not obviously so, they just have the normal human failings). The world building starts out mundane enouch but over the course of the trilogy mixes in more and more of the fantastical and mythological to keep the universe fresh and surprising throughout. And the story arc of the protagonist is one of the, if not the, best ever written.
I wish somebody could convince Peter Jackson to direct another trilogy, because he could do such amazing things with this story.
A word of warning though. The prequel series (the Gird duology (?) is a classical tragedy, and the sequels are considerably less engaging. Not exactly bad (I do not think Ms Moon can write a bad book) but certainly not up to the extremely high standard of the original Paks trilogy.
Oh, and another word of warning. Do try to read all three books after another. You definitely do not want to have to wait a couple of years between book 2 and 3, trust me on that.
6 years 5 months ago #5
by Erianaiel
Posts:
133
Gender:
Unknown
Birthdate:
Unknown
Yep.
Start with Hunting Party (the Serrano Legacy) and it gets still better from thereon. Chances are extremely high that you will adore Esmay Suiza
And you can pick up the Vatta's War series if you like military hard sci-fi.
- Erianaiel
-
Valentine wrote: One of my favorite books of all time. The final book of the series is a bit of let down, as she tried to close out every storyline.
She is also a prolific SciFi author.
Yep.
Start with Hunting Party (the Serrano Legacy) and it gets still better from thereon. Chances are extremely high that you will adore Esmay Suiza
And you can pick up the Vatta's War series if you like military hard sci-fi.
Moderators: WhateleyAdmin, Kristin Darken, E. E. Nalley, elrodw, Nagrij, MageOhki, Astrodragon, NeoMagus, Warren, Morpheus, Wasamon, sleethr, OtherEric, Bek D Corbin, MaLAguA, Souffle Girl, Phoenix Spiritus, Starwolf, DanZilla, Katie_Lyn, Maggie Finson, DrBender, JG, Bladedancer, Renae_Whateley