Question I don't know if this is the right area of the forum for this but ...
- Amy_Amethyst
-
Topic Author
Of course if the answer is 'no he wouldn't be too powerful' it would be interesting to read what somebody else would make of him ... (hint hint)
A stranger is just a friend that you haven't met yet.
- annachie
-
But really you can limit the gods power any way you want.
"This is all your body can handle"
"Oops too much for your body to handle, sorry about the GSD. Better tone it down a bit"
are two ways.
- Yolandria
-
However like others have mentioned. Keeping the power's down in the believable range without checks/balances might be an issue. But it's something that could be done.
Mistress of the shelter for lost and redeemable Woobies!
- DanZilla
-
The New Olympians are treated more as a rebirth of the god due to how they took over their bodies than an Avatar and this only worked because they had lost a lot of power over the years. At full power they probably would have burned-out the bodies.
There are multiple ways an entity can provide powers... and limitations to how much of that power can be contained within a human body.
Avatars - House the entity in a hallow and are granted powers by it in exchange for a place for it to live and a way for it to interact with the world. Forming a Symbiosis that benefits them both.
Paladins - Granted powers by an entity.. to use them for the entity's benefit in the world.
Channelers - Connect to an entity and get temporary use of energy from it in some fashion.
for more details refer to the wiki page for Avatars
Heka being an Eqyptian God of Magic and Medicine could provide powers through any of those ways but in the case of Avatar I would tend to caution that they would need to be a lower powered being than their heyday or a fractured portion of themselves.
You might also go the Imbued or Empowered route...
- MageOhki
-
Paladin/Hollow-avatar/Channeler can overlap/blend or appear similar.
Hikaru, G2's token avatar, is closer to a PALADIN/Channeler, than a 'true' avatar, precisely because as Dan pointed out, Amaterasu is excessively powerful (to the point that Ammy ... spoiler) Even then, Ammy technically bred her future champion. Kayda's another case. Etc. I comment on this, and while a spoiler: "Avatar is the widest range" because it is the most 'fuzzy' power set in my eyes.
Remember, however, Avatars like Kodiak (fully sentient spirit), Okami(Paladin/semi hollow of a class 3), Miyet (Paladin) should be the rarity
- Kristin Darken
-
Alternately, the Avatar could be a Channeler. This variant doesn't actually host a spirit or god, but instead acts more like a space station with docking ports. The spirit cooperates with the Avatar in times of need and acts on the physical world through the Avatar.
The key is in understanding that an Avatar does two things for a spirit (or extradimensional being). One, it provides a safe place for it to exist in the physical world. Generally, in their own places (other planes), spirits might be ancient and powerful beings able to acquire and wield great strength. But crossing into the physical world costs them a great deal of energy and cuts them off from their normal abilities to sustain themselves. Even just existing here constantly depletes them. Unless they are protected by a hallow... like the ones Avatar type mutants have within their extradimensional being. So... one, a spirit visiting the physical world gets to stick around without an ongoing drain on its lifeforce, pursue an agenda and so forth. Additionally, Avatars generate a spiritual energy that these beings can feed on and grow in strength. So, whether the spirit is fulling crossed over and embodying the Avatar or linked in from the other side of the veil, they benefit by gaining strength.
The Avatar gains from this arrangement only if they are either dominant enough to control some of the actions of the spirit or if the spirit has an agenda that requires its host to be 'more' than just a common baseline. So some Avatars have a 'large' hallow... which allows them to host a 'large' spirit or more than one small one without everyone bumping elbows and feeling cramped for space. Others have smaller hallows and run into space problems with many types of spirits. The actual 'size' of a spirit is not something directly tied to its physical appearance or power level, of course... but you could say that divine beings are... LARGE. They have to be because they come with a lot of baggage. This is why, when they choose a champion/paladin, the splinter is often focused on a specific aspect of their nature, as opposed to reflective of the whole being of the god.
Also, Avatars can get some advantage out of the fact that the energy that sustains their spirit also lets the spirit grow in power... if the Avatar generates too little for it, the spirit is unlikely to bond with them... or may just limit its efforts and make due with sustaining itself. But usually spirits will be attracted to Avatar in whom they can 'gain' and grow. So they feed well, and allow some/more of that power to spill back in benefits that they give the Avatar. Mostly, they have to commit to that infusion of power while the mutant is manifesting... because its easier to make changes in the host during that time when change is already in motion than to force them on a mutant who has already stabilized. But its a 'smart' move for a spirit to put everything they have into creating the most powerful host they can right from the start; because the long term benefits are worth it.
Now... a god or goddess is going to look at moving into an Avatar like being forced to live in a 100 square foot shack and eating 10 for a dollar ramen noodle packs for years. It's just not worth the energy they'll get from one person. Maybe its more than they get from ten or twenty others via faith/ritual... but still, the conditions! But getting a share of that energy by giving the Channeler a tap into your power while serving your agenda? That's not a bad deal. And neither is giving a weaker aspect of yourself over into a splinter self and allowing it to grown up while guiding your Paladin around the physical world to eventually bring all that strength and energy back to the main self when the Avatar eventually dies? That's a really good long term investment.
So the examples that other folks are tossing around? Miyet was a Paladin. Kayda is a combination example (Avatar-Tatanka and Channeler-Wakan Tanka) ... or something unique but similar enough that I can describe it like this without being 'too wrong'. Wyatt, however, is indeed an Avatar... and an enormously powerful one, which is how he manages to host Kodiak. But even with ALL that power, Kodiak is as close to a god as he manages to host.
Personal recommendation? Go with a Paladin or Channeler. But keep in mind that the power of the god doesn't have to be a blunt instrument in the hand of a host. Heka, as a source of magic and healing, is obviously powerful.... but a Paladin of such a being doesn't have to be inherently powerful him/her self. Being able to acquire knowledge and find places of power is more important than raw energy (finesse over brute force)... and being able to know where healing will be needed is perhaps more important than having the skill or power to give it. Narrowing down what specific aspect of Heka's nature that you want your Paladin to pursue, will help define your power set.
Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- elrodw
-
If she'd have been a paladin, WT would have broken off a piece of herself and put it in Kayda to provide powers. That didn't happen.
Small, not powerful spirit - avatar.
part of a spirit taken from a major spiritual entity directly in hallow - paladin
no spirit bits in residence, but power from spirit available - channeler
Never give up, Never surrender! Captain Peter Quincy Taggert
- null0trooper
-

Another benefit of a Paladin may be that it gives the Entity "eyes on the ground", possibly without triggering penalties for being where they aren't supposed to show up in local reality. That there would be a link between servant/master that other parties may take note of is just one of the risks.
A Channeller may not be as useful for "investment purposes", but the connection between the Channeller can be intermittent and therefore harder to detect/intercept/corrupt. If the Channeller works with multiple entities, residual signatures might quickly be obscured. Or not. There is a danger of directing the channel toward receiving incompatible data feeds, or the energies available to rent the channel might be incompatible with it, plus overloads in either direction. One or both parties may want a Pact in place, even if only to help stabilize the vessel being used.
Or maybe, Auntie Entity has a reason to Imbue someone with some set measure of power. Maybe they walk away afterward, maybe they occasionally kibbitz, or even take the reins when their goals call for it.
Maybe they just like hanging around or have a job to do that acting as a magician's familiar fits. ( Never meddle in the affairs of familiars, for you do not know which one is the pet! )
Thus any relationship can be as complicated or as simple, rules-bound or free-form, as needed.
Forum-posted ideas are freely adoptable.
WhatIF Stories: Buy the Book
Discussion Thread
- Kristin Darken
-
Of course, the energy from Avatars hosting them isn't the same as faith/belief based power that gods get from being worshipped... but when it comes to making things happen, power is power. So it greatly benefits gods to grow in this fashion. But yes, there is certainly an aspect of 'investment' in the process of Avatar hosting of spirits.
And, as you can see in the Ayla stories... that isn't the only place the universe mechanics parallel economics. Just look at how Mages and their handling of Essence works.
Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- Malady
-
- Kristin Darken
-
Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- Kettlekorn
-
- Arcanist Lupus
-
The best place for this question would probably either be the Workshop section of the Independent Fiction subforum or the General Concepts section of the Discussion subforum. But the general topics area where you did post it is by no means the wrong place.
"Shared pain is lessened; shared joy, increased — thus do we refute entropy." - Spider Robinson
- Kristin Darken
-
Kettlekorn wrote: Investment and economics in general are really generic concepts that apply to nearly everything. Business, weight loss, reproduction, warfare, writing, wilderness survival, gaming, engineering, whatever. What economics is really about at its core is decision making -- modeling a situation so that you can determine the optimal course of action.
Gamers: Risk vs reward?

Fate guard you and grant you a Light to brighten your Way.
- Mister D
-
null0trooper wrote: It's interesting that having investing self-fragments in Paladins is similar in some ways to investing in securities. In some way, one could say that gods/others/demons are literally invested in the World and that pantheons can be seen as investment groups dealing in souls, self-fragments, subsidiary entities, etc. A less cheerful metaphor would posit those souls/fragments as a cash crop, humans being useful mainly as a growing medium.
Another benefit of a Paladin may be that it gives the Entity "eyes on the ground", possibly without triggering penalties for being where they aren't supposed to show up in local reality. That there would be a link between servant/master that other parties may take note of is just one of the risks.
A Channeller may not be as useful for "investment purposes", but the connection between the Channeller can be intermittent and therefore harder to detect/intercept/corrupt. If the Channeller works with multiple entities, residual signatures might quickly be obscured. Or not. There is a danger of directing the channel toward receiving incompatible data feeds, or the energies available to rent the channel might be incompatible with it, plus overloads in either direction. One or both parties may want a Pact in place, even if only to help stabilize the vessel being used.
Or maybe, Auntie Entity has a reason to Imbue someone with some set measure of power. Maybe they walk away afterward, maybe they occasionally kibbitz, or even take the reins when their goals call for it.
Maybe they just like hanging around or have a job to do that acting as a magician's familiar fits. ( Never meddle in the affairs of familiars, for you do not know which one is the pet! )
Thus any relationship can be as complicated or as simple, rules-bound or free-form, as needed.
Sounds like someone's been channeling Ayla Goodkind...

Measure Twice
- Mister D
-
Kristin Darken wrote:
Kettlekorn wrote: Investment and economics in general are really generic concepts that apply to nearly everything. Business, weight loss, reproduction, warfare, writing, wilderness survival, gaming, engineering, whatever. What economics is really about at its core is decision making -- modeling a situation so that you can determine the optimal course of action.
Gamers: Risk vs reward?
Everything that can be described as energy, can be modelled.
This includes coherence/dissonance in structure, modelled as the differences in levels of entropy.
It's worth re-reading Claude Shannon's work, in light of this, as it's an extremely effective magical text.
Another book that i mention regularly, is Ray Sherwin's "The Book Of Results". From an Information-Theory point-of-view, it's got some really chewy idea's, that are applicable to game design, systems simulation, and, memetic engineering.
It's also a work of heresy, as far as every religion is concerned, but that's another story...

Measure Twice